Skip to content

Atomic and Molecular Physics Homework 3

Chasse_neige

Question 1: Ramsey fringes and atomic clock (50 points)

image-20251104101453577

Radiation pulses

At t=0, the atom enters the interaction region. The atom is prepared initially in the state |0, i.e. σx=σy=0 and σz=1. Assume that the atom stays in the interaction region for a time τ and that the magnetic field is homogeneous in that region. Suppose ω=ω0.

(a) Represent the evolution of the Bloch vector on the Bloch sphere, and find the vector σ after time τ (choosing Rabi frequency

such that Ω0τ=π2).

Given that the time evolving equation can be represented as

dσdt=W×σ

in the rotating frame where W=(Ω,0,ωω0)

So when it exactly resonances, the Pauli matrix vector will evolve as

σx(t)=0σy(t)=sin(Ωt)σz(t)=cos(Ωt)

After time τ, the components of the Pauli matrix vector will become

σ=(0,1,0)

in the rotating frame.

(b) After the interaction region, the atom moves freely in the upper part of the clock chamber for a duration of Tτ, after which they fall back into the interaction region due to gravity.

Represent the evolution of the Bloch vector on the Bloch sphere, and find the vector σ after T.

In the upper part of the clock chamber, the time evolving equation for the Pauli matrix vector becomes

dσdt=0

in the rotating frame.

So in the rotating frame, the vector σ stays unchanged.

σ=(0,1,0)

(c) Since the atoms fall freely, in this second pass, they spend the same amount of time τ in the interaction region as in the first pass. Represent again the evolution of the Bloch vector on the Bloch sphere after the interaction (choosing Rabi frequency such that Ω0τ=π2).

The evolvement of the Pauli matrix vector is

σx=0σy=cos(Ωt)σz=sin(Ωt)

After the time τ, the vector will become

σ=(0,0,1)

(d) Compute the coordinates of the Bloch vector. Use the result to compute the probability to detect the atom in state |1 after the whole sequence as a function of the frequency difference between the microwave field and the atomic resonance during free evolution (assuming a non-resonant interaction in the interaction regime for the time being), and show that this probability oscillates. This pattern is called 'Ramsey fringes'. What is the quality factor of the oscillation (ratio between the frequency of the atomic transition and the fringe period? Use the frequency of atomic transition of a cesium atom 9192631770Hz, and a realistic free evolution time of 300ms for typical fountain experiments.

If there exists a detuning of Δ=ωω0, the evolvement of the Pauli matrix vector will become (ignore the detuning effect in the first and second pass, for the phase shift it caused is too small compared to the phase shift in the T free part)

dσdt=(Ω,0,Δ)×σ

So after the time τ, the vector will become

σ=(0,1,0)

In the free evolving part T, the vector will rotate will the frequency of Δ in the rotating frame, so the vector will be

σ=(sin(ΔT),cos(ΔT),0)

before it falls into the interaction region the second time.

In the second pass, the Pauli matrix vector becomes

σx=sin(ΔT)σy=cos(ΔT)cos(Ωt)σz=cos(ΔT)sin(Ωt)

So after the π2 time τ, the vector will become

σ=(sin(ΔT),0,cos(ΔT))

So the probability to detect the atom in state |1 after the whole sequence is

P|1=1σz2=1+cos(ΔT)2=cos2(Δ2T)

The quality factor equals

Q=ω0T2π

Under the circumstance given by the question where the frequency of atomic transition of a cesium atom 9192631770Hz, and a realistic free evolution time of 300ms, the quality factor is

Q=9192631770Hz×300×103s2.76×109

Quantum projection noise

There is a fundamental limit to the accuracy at which one can measure the position of the Ramsey fringes, and therefore the precision of the clock. Suppose that we are now working with N atoms (of the order of 106 in real experiments), close to the point of the maximum sensitivity of the clock. Show that the probability of detect n atoms in state |1 in the final measurement follows the Poisson distribution. What is the standard deviation? How does it convert into the standard deviation of the frequency? This noise comes from the fact that at measurement, each atom is projected in one or the other internal state. The randomness that is added in that step leads to a fundamental noise which is called quantum projection noise.

By measuring the probability to observe the atom in state |1, we obtain a signal that varies very fast when the frequency is detuned. The sensitivity of the clock is the derivative of the probability with respect to the frequency difference. What is this value? Where is it maximum? How could one increase it?

Suppose that I've made N detections and from the former calculation we can say that the distribution of the true detections will obey the Poisson Distribution

P(X=n)=eNp(Np)nn!

where p is the probability to detect the atom in state |1 after the whole sequence

p=cos2(Δ2T)

So the standard deviation is

σn=Np=Ncos(Δ2T)

The relation between the detected n and the frequency is

ω=ω0+2Tarccos(nN)

So the standard deviation of the frequency is

σω=1TσnNn1nN=1Tσnsin(Δ2T)Ncos(Δ2T)=1NTsin(Δ2T)

The sensitivity of the clock

S=ddΔcos2(Δ2T)=Tsin(Δ2T)cos(Δ2T)

Maximum

Smax=T2

One could increase the maximum by increasing T.

Effects of the detuning during the interaction

So far we assume that the microwave is on resonance in the interaction area. In fact, when the microwave oscillator is off resonance, the detuning occurs in the interaction area as well. Use 3D rotation matrices in Mathematica to compute the Ramsey fringes including the effects of detuning considering the case where Ω0τ=π2, Ω0=14 Hz and the interrogation time is T=3 s.

The Mathematica Script is as follows

mathematica
TransitionProbability[x_] := Module[
  {rabiFrequency = 14, detuningFrequency = x, totalFrequency, 
   interrogationTime = 3, interactionTime, blochVector},
  totalFrequency = Sqrt[rabiFrequency^2 + detuningFrequency^2];
  interactionTime = Pi/(2*rabiFrequency);
  blochVector = {0, 0, 1};
  
  (*The first Pi/2 pulse*)
  blochVector = 
   blochVector . 
    RotationMatrix[
     totalFrequency*interactionTime, {rabiFrequency, 0, 
      detuningFrequency}];
  
  (*The interrogation region*)
  blochVector = 
   blochVector . 
    RotationMatrix[detuningFrequency*interrogationTime, {0, 0, 1}];
  
  (*The second Pi/2 pulse*)
  blochVector = 
   blochVector . 
    RotationMatrix[
     totalFrequency*interactionTime, {rabiFrequency, 0, 
      detuningFrequency}];
  
  finalPossibility = (1 - blochVector[[3]])/2;
  finalPossibility  
  ]

Plot[TransitionProbability[x], {x, -60, 60}]
image-20251112220550103image-20251104101603947

Question 2 (30 points)

(a) The lifetime of the 5p state of Rb is 26.2ns, wavelength is 780nm. What is the linewidth of the 5s5p transition?

Δf=12πτ

where τ=26.2ns=26.2×109s

Δf=12π×26.2×1096.07×106Hz=6.07MHz

Thus, the linewidth is 6.07MHz.

(b) Calculate the saturation intensity of Rb 5s5p transition in units of W/cm2.

The saturation intensity is defined by

Isat=hν2Γ3λ22π=πhcΓ3λ3=πhc3λ3τ

So the saturation intensity equals

Isat=πhc3(780×109m)326.2×109s1.673×103W/cm2

(c) A student wants to probe a Rb gas with 1mW of light near the 5s-5p transition, the light beam is collimated with a waist w of 1mm. Calculate the Rabi frequency experienced by the atoms.

I=2Pπw2,IIsat=2Ω2Γ2

Laser intensity,

I=2×0.001π×(0.001)2=0.002π×106636.6W/m2

The ratio IIsat is:

IIsat=636.616.7438.03

The Rabi frequency Ω is related by

IIsat=2Ω2Γ2

where Γ=3.817×107s1. Solving for Ω

Ω2=IIsat×Γ22=38.03×(3.817×107)222.770×1016Ω=2.770×10161.66×108rad/s

Thus, the Rabi frequency is 1.66×10rad/s.

(d) Estimate the number of photons scattered by one atom per unit time assuming that the laser detuning is 12 MHz.

Consider

Rsc=n(ω)σ(ω,I)=Iω0σ0(ω0)Γ24Δ2+(1+IIsat)Γ24σ0(ω0)=6πc2ω02

So the scattering rate for a two-level atom is

Rsc=Γ2IIsat1+IIsat+(2ΔΓ)2

where:

Δ=12MHz=12×106Hz and Angular detuning Δangular=2πΔ=2π×12×1067.54×107rad/s.

Compute:

2ΔΓ=2×7.54×1073.817×1073.95,(2ΔΓ)215.601+IIsat+(2ΔΓ)2=1+38.03+15.60=54.63Rsc=3.817×1072×38.0354.631.909×107×0.6961.33×107s1

Thus, the scattering rate is around 1.33×107 photons per second.

Question 3: D.C. Stark shift (20 points)

(a) An atom with two levels of energies E2>E1, and a separation of ϵ=E2E1 is placed in a static electric field. Show that the Hamiltonian for the system has the form

H^=(ϵ2VVϵ2),

where the matrix element for the perturbation V is proportional to the magnitude of the electric field. Find the energy eigenvalues. The two levels move apart as shown in Fig. 7.9—this is a general feature of systems where a perturbation mixes the wavefunctions.

The unperturbed Hamiltonian for the two-level system has energies E1 and E2, with ϵ=E2E1. Choosing the zero of energy at the average E1+E22, the energies become ϵ2 and ϵ2. The static electric field introduces a perturbation HI=dE, where d is the dipole moment operator. Assuming the states have opposite parity, the off-diagonal matrix element V=1|HI|2 is non-zero and proportional to the electric field magnitude. Thus, the Hamiltonian is

H^=(ϵ2VVϵ2)

The energy eigenvalues are found by solving det(H^EI)=0

(ϵ2E)(ϵ2E)V2=0E=±12ϵ2+4V2

Thus, the eigenvalues are E±=±12ϵ2+4V2.

(b) Show that 'weak' fields produce a quadratic Stark effect on the atom, equivalent to the usual second-order perturbation-theory expression for a perturbation HI

ΔE1=|2|HI|1|2E2E1

A similar expression can be found for the energy shift ΔE2 of the other level (in the opposite direction).

For weak fields, Vϵ, the eigenvalues can be expanded as

E±=±12ϵ2+4V2=±ϵ21+4V2ϵ2±ϵ2(1+2V2ϵ2)=±ϵ2±V2ϵ

The unperturbed energies are E1=ϵ2 and E2=ϵ2, so the shifts are:

ΔE1V2ϵΔE2V2ϵ

In perturbation theory, HI has matrix element 2|HI|1=V, so

ΔE1=|2|HI|1|2E2E1=V2ϵ

which matches the expansion. Similarly, ΔE2=V2ϵ. This quadratic dependence on V (and thus on the electric field) is the quadratic Stark effect.

(c) Estimate the Stark shift for the ground state of a sodium atom in a field of 106V m1 (e.g. 104V between plates 1cm apart).

For the ground state of sodium, the Stark shift is estimated using second-order perturbation theory. The dominant contribution comes from the first excited state, with energy difference ΔE=E3pE3s2.1eV. The oscillator strength for the 3s3p transition is f1. The dipole matrix element squared is

|3p|d|3s|2=e232f2mΔE

The energy shift for the ground state is

ΔEground=E2|3p|d|3s|2ΔE

with electric fieldE=106V/m, ΔE2.1eV, |d|23f2ΔE19.43a02 .

Then

ΔEground2.59×108eV

Thus, the Stark shift for the ground state of sodium in a field of 106V/m is approximately 3×108eV.

Built with VitePress